Article / if you are asked to refute the thesis that the violence is the only tool to solve problems between people, what would be your position on that?
* Introduction / Champions Ray seems intact - if some believe that violence is the best way to resolve problems and conflicts between people, how can we heroes of this opinion, and disclosure of goodwill and legitimate way to solve problems?
* Width / logic thesis * see the thesis that violence is the only tool to solve problems between people and violence Violence: is all behavior pressed by a person on others will for one reason or another "last violence is all the arbitrariness in the use of force, any departures from the specified rolling frame sense it. and violence several reasons, including but .......................................... this thesis is sound and do not reflect the truth
* Invalidate the thesis with arguments and examples / The best way to solve problems between people is tolerance as a moral and civilized behavior and tolerance Tolérance: it is lenient with those who offended, or forgive those who sinned in your right or assaulted you in a manner that ** Tolerance means respect, acceptance and appreciation of the rich diversity our world's cultures and forms of expression and human qualities we have. This tolerance is enhanced knowledge, openness, communication and freedom of thought, conscience and belief. And that harmony in the context of difference ............................................. ........
I've admitted Jean-Jacques Rousseau says JJRousseau .......................... (The Social Charter can not be based on violence and thereby gain legitimacy it does not the existence of the right of the strongest) the same principle is defended by Kant, where he says (it should be given the respect every human being as an end in itself and not just the way)
Islam is a religion of tolerance and rejects violence and hatred ....................................... and the effects of religious tolerance arguing different in doctrine that is better for the verse in Surah (Invite to the way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching and argue with them is the best that the Lord is knows who strayed from His ways and he knows Palmetdan) and is to God believing slaves to pay evil with good: {nor equal footing good nor bad Repel evil is better if the enmity between you and him like a guardian intimate} (separated: 34)
* Cash supporters thesis /
Thomas Hobbes T.Hobbes believes that human evil by nature and prone to violence, and .................................. the same idea is found when Machiavelli Machiavel when people considered Khbaython by nature so it should not one be always honest, and that the cruelty and immorality ensure the state prestige and continuity, he says (it is better that people Akhcak that love you) and the end justifies the means and necessity do not know law and political as well as the Russian Marxist Leon Trotsky and the American writer and academic Ward Churchill they have been critical of severe to the principle of non-violence on their diversity, nonviolence is an attempt to impose morality aristocrats on the hard-working, and that violence is necessary to achieve revolutionary change, or that the right of self-defense is a fundamental principle. It is that this view is sound and his arguments are unconvincing
Monetary / N violence only begets violence, and do not meet, but by and this would spoil things and do not fix it, but the worsening situation more leads and shattering relations between members of the same community and the same family, Violence produces hostility and tension and desire vengeance and a justification for the destruction and vandalism, and is a method of primitive uncivilized does not rise to the level of human Valehioan not resort to violence, but the need for biological such as hunting or self-defense, how the human being is characterized by reason and moral values, of what led to the emergence of non-violence theories about the need for the use of peaceful means to claim rights or to resolve differences and conflicts.
Conclusion / emphasis on the legality of the Champions / We conclude that the problems and conflicts between people can be solved only the principle of tolerance and mutual understanding and cooperation, and it is a treatise unlawful violence can not be adopted
In the latter does not forget to participate with us in the page and click on the button Likes to receive each new Thanks
إرسال تعليق